Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Am J Nurs ; 121(8): 22, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1612686

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration has granted emergency use authorization to sotrovimab for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 in patients at increased risk for progression to severe illness.Sotrovimab is a monoclonal antibody that works directly against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 to block its attachment and entry into a human cell.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Prior Authorization/legislation & jurisprudence , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Prior Authorization/trends , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration/organization & administration , United States Food and Drug Administration/trends , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
4.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 78(17): 1591-1599, 2021 08 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1087689

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A common denial trend that occurs with "outpatient medical benefit drugs" (ie, medications covered by a medical benefit plan and administered in an outpatient visit) is payers not requiring or permitting prior authorization (PA) proactively, yet denying the drug after administration for medical necessity. In this situation, a preemptive strategy of complying with payer-mandated requirements is critical for revenue protection. To address this need, our institution incorporated a medical necessity review into its existing closed-loop, pharmacy-managed precertification and denials management program. SUMMARY: Referrals for targeted payers and high-cost medical benefit drugs not eligible for PA and deemed high risk for denial were incorporated into the review. Payer medical policies were evaluated and clinical documentation assessed to confirm alignment. This descriptive report outlines the medical necessity workflow as a component of the larger precertification process, details the decision-making process when performing the review, and delineates the roles and responsibilities for involved team members. A total of 526 drug orders were evaluated from September 2018 to August 2019, with 146 interventions completed. Of the 761 individual claims affected by proactive medical necessity review, 99.2% resulted in payment and less than 1% resulted in revenue loss, safeguarding more than $5.3 million in annual institutional drug reimbursement. At the time of analysis, there were only 3 cases of revenue loss. CONCLUSION: Our institution's pharmacy-managed medical necessity review program for high-cost outpatient drugs safeguards reimbursement for therapies not eligible for payer PA. It is a revenue cycle best practice that can be replicated at other institutions.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations , Documentation , Humans , Outpatients , Prior Authorization , Workflow
6.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 60(3): e22-e27, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-548369

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing hospice need, a growing shortage of hospice providers, and concerns about in-person services because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) require hospices to innovate care delivery. MEASURES: This project compared outcomes between hospice reauthorization visits conducted via telehealth and in person. After each visit, providers, patients, and caregivers completed telehealth acceptance surveys, and providers recorded reauthorization recommendations. INTERVENTION: Providers conducted 88 concurrent in-person and telehealth visits between June and November 2019. OUTCOMES: No statistically significant differences in reauthorization recommendations were found between telehealth and in-person visits. Satisfaction with telehealth was high; 88% of patients/caregivers and 78% of providers found telehealth services as effective as in-person visits. CONCLUSIONS/LESSONS LEARNED: Results indicate that telehealth can successfully support clinical decision making for hospice reauthorization. These findings show telehealth to be reliable and acceptable for certain types of hospice care even before COVID-19, which emphasizes its importance both during and after the current public health emergency.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Hospice Care/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Satisfaction , Prior Authorization , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL